MINUTES of the Grower & Industry Advisory
Committee meeting of the OKANAGAN-KOOTENAY
STERILE INSECT RELEASE (SIR) PROGRAM held in
Committee Members:
Gavin Young -
Chair Westbank Packers Ltd
Jack
Pierre Calissi BC
Fruit Growers’ Association
Paul Jeffares BC
Fruit Packers
Denis Larose Grower
Charlotte Leaming Sun Fresh Coop
Joseph Lucich Grower
Wayne Matthews C.S.R.D. Director / SIR Board Member
Brian Mennel Organic
Grower
Tom Ouchi Grower
Stan Swales Okanagan North Growers Coop
Manuel Torres Jr. BC Fruit Growers’ Association (Oliver)
Peter Waterman Grower
/ Consultant
Brian
Witzke Grower
Bob
Fisher-Fleming BC Fruit Packers
Committee Members Absent:
Nirmal Dhaliwal Okanagan
Similkameen Coop
Hugh Philip BCMAFF
Regional Entomologist
Gerry Shaw BC
Tree Fruits
Tim Watson
Guests:
John Casorso Grower
Steve Day Grower
SIR Staff:
AGENDA TOPIC #2:
Approval of Minutes
The following motion was put forward.
Moved by
Joseph
Lucich Seconded by Peter Waterman
“Accepted minutes for meeting dated
CARRIED.
Gavin
Young then introduced guests Rob Casorso, John Casorso, and Steve Day.
JOHN CASORSO, ROBERT CASORSO, STEVE
DAY:
John
Casorso made the following points regarding his personal assessment of the SIR
Program for 2002:
2000
·
5 sprays – minimal damage but more than 99.
2001
·
2 applications of Last Call applied at full strength.
·
5 sprays.
·
Final cover sprayed after
·
40,000 lbs. of
2002
·
12 acres of Pears had intense damage, especially in 2002.
·
Was reassured that with spraying throughout the season, that there
would be no resistance.
·
Larval testing for chemical spray resistance not available until Spring
of 2003.
·
30” turbo mist used. Up to date calibration & maintenance.
·
Pruned in the summer.
·
Prior to harvest, the Casorsos noticed high amount of damaged fruit in
their orchards, and asked the SIR Program to “not” release anymore moths in
their blocks. They applied another chemical spray for the season, and saw very
little damage afterwards. Was a hot fall, which poses other questions.
·
Casorsos put their trust and confidence into the system, and were team
players that went along with everything that SIR had given them.
·
SIR did their part on doing whatever they could, but it failed. The
technology is not strong enough to solve a problem like this situation. And the
scary part is that the problem was not identified, and even today only theories
are being discussed.
·
2 cover sprays (Zolone) in June.
·
Full strength sprayed (Zolone) July 9th & 25th .
·
Sprays were applied August 2nd , 13th, & 27th
. Eight sprays (Imidan and Zolone) done in the Pear blocks. No Guthion used
in the Pears for about 15 years.
·
Significant damage was assessed even before bins were put out in the
orchards.
·
Moths were not released until July.
·
Full Mating Disruption was also hung throughout the orchard.
·
Was not aware until August that SIT does not work in a high pressure
area.
·
At end of day, 20-30% of apples lost plus 50,000 lbs. of Pears.
·
Picking costs running about $50.00 per bin at harvest.
·
Should not have to accept cost of operations: taxation, increase of
spray cost, and damage.
·
Running $50.00 per bin for harvest.
·
Request for compensation was denied.
·
If nothing is done in this next context of trials, next option is to
seek legal counsel.
Gavin
Young then made the following points:
·
Started the meeting by asking about “Area Wide Management” –
methodology and approach for control. Blanket treatments. There are times when
the individual needs to have the option to take his own action. There is not a
mechanism within the management control system to indicate when the timing is
the best. The monitoring failed the grower.
·
How do we ensure that the grower can take their own initiative when
they feel that it is appropriate to do so?
·
Can the Field Service stay on top early enough, to advise when that
decision occurs?
·
Most growers want to be team players, but when there is a problem with
this magnitude, the grower needs to take the measures that they need to take.
This needs to be done without feeling guilty or feeling let down by the system.
·
The chemicals are also suspect; the protection is not on the fruit. The
fruit is being damaged. It is only the chemicals that protect the fruit. SIT,
Mating Disruption are only passive control measures. They only deal with the
adult moths and only work effectively when the populations are low.
Steve
Day made the following points regarding his personal assessment of the SIR
Program for 2002:
2000
·
Problem has arisen since 2000.
·
A number of things that have happened since the year 2000 that puts all
these Pears on the ground, as a direct result of the SIR direction and the
Programs that have been implemented.
2001
·
Major problem in Benvoulin blocks.
·
Average of 25-30 stings per tree.
·
In 2001, they have sprayed more then they had in prior years. Used to
have traps up every 2 acres, would time sprays according to the numbers that
were used, which were higher threshold numbers used than for the apples (which
were to be 5 moths per trap for the Pears – but would spray at 2 moths per
trap.
·
Localized to 1 block
2002
·
In 2002, problems in Pear blocks documented in the South weren’t
relayed to Steve.
·
Feels that growers have lost their ability to effectively monitor due to
Mating Disruption hung throughout the orchards.
·
Mating Disruption, SIT, Zolone, and Confirm does not really work on
high populations. Because of that, this problem has been building up
significantly.
·
Spray timing may be off by a few days, which is critical when a spray
like Imidan needs to be done on accurate timing.
·
F1 Moths released, which he does not know the viability of those moths.
That had not been definitely answered yet.
·
In the last three years this problem has been building up and has
gotten worse.
·
June 14th, Zolone coverage every 2 weeks.
·
Covered up to 7 days pre-harvest.
·
Large population of moths in orchard.
·
Aware that Hugh Philip already stated that neither Mating Disruption
nor SIR technology will work in these high-pressure areas.
·