MINUTES of the Grower & Industry Advisory
Committee meeting of the OKANAGAN-KOOTENAY
STERILE INSECT RELEASE (SIR) PROGRAM held at the Pacific Agriculture
Research Centre in
Committee Members:
Gavin Young - Chair Westbank
Packers Ltd.
Jack
Nirmal Dhaliwal Okanagan
Similkameen Coop
Denis Larose Grower
Joseph Lucich Grower
Brian Mennel Organic
Grower
Tom Ouchi Grower
Tim Watson
Brian Witzke Grower
Committee Members Absent:
Paul Jaffares BC
Fruit Packers
Charlotte Leaming Sun Fresh Coop
Hugh Philip BCMAFF
Regional Entomologist
Gerry Shaw BC
Tree Fruits
Stan Swales Okanagan North Growers Coop
Manuel Toris Jr. BC Fruit Growers’ Association (Oliver)
Peter Waterman Grower
/ Consultant
SIR Staff:
Bob Fugger General Manager
Rob Gauthier Zone 1 Field Manager
Adrian McCluskey Public Relations Officer
Karen Nelson Recording Secretary
AGENDA TOPIC #1:
Approval of Minutes
Moved by Denis Larose Seconded by Joseph Lucich
“Accepted minutes for meeting dated
CARRIED.
Business Arising
After discussing the motion made on Page 4 from the
minutes dated
Moved by Denis Larose Seconded by Brian Mennel
“The Grower & Industry Advisory Committee
moves that SIR should continue with existing control measures in any given area
(for example: Similkameen Valley), until it meets the CFIA pest free
definition.”
CARRIED.
AGENDA TOPIC #2:
Christine made the following points regarding her
Report:
·
Wants to clarify that when the term “rational
grower” is mentioned in her report, this is an economic term, which is used in
financial feasibility studies.
·
Comment in back of the report of Part 2, regarding
the concerns of mating disruption and SIR – there are differences of opinion
within the SIR Program – and is in some cases counter productive to the future
design of the Program – and needs to be addressed. She was merely indicating
that this appears to be a problem and hopefully it can be resolved.
Gavin then addressed S3, and S4 from Part 2, on Page
3 of Christines report. These two scenarios are the least costly of all the
options. He asked Christine what the relative merits of each one were.
Christine stated that no technical changes were made
to report after review by the SIR Technical Committee.
Options S3 & S4 show the lowest cost scenarios
of all the options. Even though they are different technologies, they are close
enough in cost that, if there were to be a minor change in either one of them
to carry out the Program, it would not make a substantial change from the
costs. These costs are a general cost for a maintenance program after 2005.
They are subject to change, keeping in mind that new technologies may come at
that time – but also understanding that any of those new technologies do come
with a price as well.
Gavin then noted that for post 2005, the SIR Board
proposed taxing at:
·
Urban -.10¢ per $1000.00 of assessed value for
land (current taxing
at 19.5¢ per $1000.00).
·
Orchard – up to $100.00 per acre.
This is not cut in stone. John Berry
(representing the Federal Government) had stated at the SIR Board Meeting –
that they are very keen on having a statement that he can take back indicating
a commitment from Growers and Regional Districts to that kind of level. It is
subject to review. They are not solid figures. It ends up being between $85.00-$100.00 per acre price tag. That is based
without Federal or Provincial contributions of any kind. They are still looking
at no funding from Federal and Provincial Governments after 2005. It then comes
back to the Regional Districts and the Growers to maintain the benefits of the
Program that would be achieved up to that time.
Bob noted that it was important to the Federal
Government that the Regional Districts understood what their obligations might
be after 2005. Also that the growers understood what was
expected because it is a grower Program.
Tom Ouchi noted that there has been a lot of
negativity from NORD and the City of
After discussion, the following motion was put
forward:
Moved by Tim Watson Seconded by Jack Barkwill
“The Grower & Industry Advisory Committee
moves that growers are prepared to contribute their fair portion together with
contributions from all four levels of government (Federal,Provincial,Municipal,
and Regional Districts) and that this will endorse our commitment to a
sustainable, economic codling moth control program.”
CARRIED.
The Grower & Industry Advisory Committee
then pointed out some minor changes that need to be made in the Financial portion of Christine’s Report. Christine did accept such changes and notes
some that had already been done.
Denis Larose (from Creston) then stated that he
has been talking with other growers in the Creston area, and stated that there
is definitely a need for area-wide control in Creston.
The following motion was then put forward:
Moved by Jack Barkwill Seconded by Tom Ouchi
“The Grower & Industry Advisory Committee
endorses an area wide control program post 2005.”
CARRIED.
AGENDA TOPIC #3:
Program – 2002
Bob discussed the changes in the SIR Programs
timeline as per the SIR Boards request from the last meeting on
These changes affect the Budget due to having
to have ATV release drivers, van drivers, and having more staff than what was
expected – due to having releases in Zone 3.
Bob then stated the following points:
Zone 1:
Ø
Moth
release from April – June. More
in hot spots.
Ø
Monitoring
(less sites).
Ø
SIR
only where necessary from July – August.
Zone 2:
Ø
F1
moth release from May – August in the Glenmore and Belgo area.
Ø
Mating
Disruption in all other areas at 200 per acre.
Ø
All
orchardists need to spray for first brood.
Ø
F1
moth release in all areas in July – August.
Ø
All
high-risk orchards spray for second brood.
Zone 3:
Ø
Mating
Disruption in all areas at 200 per acre.
Ø
All
orchardists need to spray for first brood.
Ø
F1
moth release in all areas in July – August.
Ø
All
high-risk orchards spray for second brood.
Creston:
Ø
SIR
in all areas.
Ø
Mating
Disruption as required.
Ø
Spraying
as required.
2002 Parcel Taxes:
Ø
Municipal
à $92.74.
Ø
Rural
à $97.61.
v A question was asked about
Compliance Grants, and it was reported that no Compliance Grants would be
issued for 2001.
After discussion, the Grower & Industry
Advisory Committee made the following motion:
Moved by Tom Ouchi Seconded by Joseph Lucich
“The Grower & Industry Advisory Committee
supports the resolution that the SIR Board made to move the time table up in
Zone 3 – maximizing use of all assets.”
CARRIED.
The meeting was then adjourned.
_______________________
________________________
Chairman Secretary