MINUTES of the Grower & Industry Advisory
Committee meeting of the OKANAGAN-KOOTENAY
STERILE INSECT RELEASE (SIR) PROGRAM held at the Pacific Agriculture
Research Centre in
Committee Members:
Gavin Young - Chair Westbank
Packers Ltd.
Jack
Denis Larose Grower
Charlotte Leaming Sun Fresh Coop
Joseph Lucich Grower
Brian Mennel Organic
Grower
Dave Mitchell BC
Fruit Packers
Gerry Shaw BC
Tree Fruits
Stan Swales Okanagan North Growers Coop
Tim Watson
Brian
Witzke Grower
Committee Members Absent:
Pedro Barata BC
Fruit Growers’ Association (Oliver) (absent)
Nirmal Dhaliwal Okanagan
Similkameen Coop (absent)
Tom Ouchi Grower (absent)
Hugh Philip BCMAFF
Regional Entomologist (absent)
Peter Waterman Grower
/ Consultant (absent)
Guests:
Dr. Adalecio Kovaleski Entomologist,
Christine Dendy MG
Powell & Associates Ltd.
SIR Staff:
AGENDA TOPIC #1:
Opening Remarks
Gavin Young introduced Dr. Adalecio Kovaleski,
visiting from
Approval of Minutes
Moved by
Gerry Shaw Seconded
by Joseph Lucich
“Accepted minutes for meeting dated
CARRIED.
Review Resolutions
After review of the Okanagan-Kootenay Sterile Insect
Release Boards passed minutes dated
Moved by
Gerry Shaw Seconded
by Denis Larose
“The Grower & Industry Advisory Committee
accepts the changes that the Okanagan-Kootenay Sterile Insect Release Board
made to the motion passed from the Grower & Industry Advisory Committee
meeting on
CARRIED.
P.M.R.A. Meeting
Gerry Shaw then addressed the meeting that Brian
Witzke,
Gerry
discussed a level playing field where all competitors can sell apples by using
what is available to everyone else. Wendy basically responded by stating that
there was no problem with that. As long as the chemical companies ask for
registration, it can be done.
Brian
Witzke noted that when Companies go in for re-registration, it costs them
approximately $200.00. Some Companies could go in and re-register to change
wording so that Canadian Growers are able to use those chemicals as a thinning
agent (ex: Sevin).
Gavin
stated that Wendy Sexsmith detailed the process that Companies need to follow
if they are going to move quickly towards registration for fast tracking – to
use data interchangeably for each zone.
Gerry
Shaw said that they had asked Wendy if any Company had been tracked, and she
said no. Wendy blames this on the Companies themselves.
Brian
Myers, from Growers Supply, will be getting together with
The Grower & Industry Advisory Committee then
made the following motion:
Moved by
Charlotte Leaming Seconded
by Brian Witzke
“The Grower & Industry Advisory Committee
tables the past motion dated
Moved
by Brian
Witzke Seconded
by Joseph Lucich
“Whereas enormous amounts of money have been issued
from the Federal and Provincial Governments, and tree fruit Growers for the SIR
Program and Growing With Care Program;
And whereas in order to get growers to produce a safer
and healthier product for Canadian Consumers;
Therefore be it resolved that the SIR Grower &
Industry Advisory Committee ask the PMRA to initiate a zero pesticide tolerance
regulation on imported fruit with residues of pesticides not registered for use
in Canada.”
CARRIED.
CARRIED.
Approval of Minutes
Minutes dated May 28th, 2001 had been
reviewed by the Grower & Industry Advisory Committee, but had not been
passed due to being side tracked. Gavin will discuss this at the next
meeting.
AGENDA TOPIC #2:
Christine Dendy then came into the meeting, and
presented her report regarding Post 2005 – economic evaluation. Christine
wanted it noted that this was not the final
draft.
Christine then made the following points:
·
Part 1 report is in a draft state at this time, and
the numbers are not, by no means, finalized. This needs to be reviewed and
modified prior to being re-issued. Part 1 is to define and evaluate the
technical options. Part 2 is to look at
the sustainability of the Program.
See the following attachments:
·
Summary of Costs: Low Monitoring, Continuous
Treatment.
·
Summary of Costs: High Monitoring, Treatment as
Required.
·
The Long Term Sustainability of the “SIR” Program.
Gavin questioned Christine if grower interventions
make the cost factor come down?
Christine stated that it does to a certain extent –
as she explained that there would not be 30 monitors running around after 2005.
Christine understands that the first stage of the
report is full of holes. Many questions need to be reviewed until the report
can be finished.
Christine then continued her report with overhead
copies (see attachments).
As she continued, she noted that Mike Kowaluk, and
the SIR Board felt that is would be easy to stipulate nurseries into not
selling Codling Moth Host trees.
The Grower & Industry Advisory Committee then
made the following motion:
Moved by
Stan Swales Seconded
by Gerry Shaw
“The Grower & Industry Advisory Committee
recommends that the SIR Board bans the sales of all host trees, for urban use,
at all local and reputable nurseries.”
AGENDA TOPIC #3:
The Grower & Industry Advisory Committee made
the following points regarding the SIR Program post 2005 regarding the question
on how to measure success:
|
IDEAS |
GROWER |
|
·
No individual orchards are out of control. ·
Can be successful with grower failures. ·
Biological measure of success. ·
Hot spots are less than ??? – needs to be
decided. ·
Environmentally acceptable / sustainability
(costs are no more than insecticide sprays). ·
Elimination of urban pressures. |
·
Economic measure of success. ·
Population predictability. ·
Cost of control less than / equal to MD,
Confirm, etc. ·
Not more than 1 spray every 5 years. ·
Elimination of moderately / highly toxic
compounds. |
The following
motion was then put forward.
Moved by
Stan Swales Seconded by Charlotte
Leaming
“The Grower & Industry Advisory Committee
moves that the SIR Program is successful, post 2005, if it provides
sustainable, economic codling moth control.
Whereas:
·
The value of damaged fruit in any
orchard is no more than the cost of alternative controls per acre.
·
Total cost to growers, to control
codling moth, is less than alternative environmentally sensitive controls.
·
Sterile moths are the primary
control method.”
CARRIED.
AGENDA TOPIC #4:
Brian Witzke then questioned
The meeting was then adjourned at
_______________________
________________________
Chairman Secretary