MINUTES of the Grower/Industry Committee
meeting of the OKANAGAN-KOOTENAY STERILE
INSECT RELEASE (SIR) PROGRAM held at the Pacific Agriculture Research
Centre in
Committee Members:
Gavin Young - Chair Westbank
Packers Ltd.
Jack
Denis Larose Grower
Joseph Lucich Grower
Tom Ouchi Grower
Hugh Philip BCMAF Regional
Entomologist
Hank
Brian Witzke Grower
Committee Members Absent:
Pedro Barata BC
Fruit Growers’ Association (Oliver) (absent)
Norm Filipenko Sun
Fresh Coop (absent)
Russell Husch BC
Fruit Growers’ Association (
Brian Mennel Grower (absent)
Jack Morley Okanagan
Similkameen Coop (absent)
Gerry
Stan Swales Okanagan North Growers Coop (absent)
Peter Waterman Okanagan
Similkameen Coop (absent)
Tim Watson
SIR Staff:
Elise Petersen SIR Business Manager
Bob Fugger Zone
2 & 3 Manager
Karen Nelson Recording Secretary
Gavin
Young called the meeting to order at
Gavin
Young stated that the purpose of the meeting was in order to have a
continuation from the last meeting on
AGENDA TOPIC #2:
Elise
Petersen issued the following reports:
·
SIR
Estimated Cost Per
·
Revenues (see
attached)
·
Final
Budget 2000-08-29 (see
attached)
Gavin
Young then discussed his notes from the side board.
1. SIT – Production and Release 100/acre Area Wide Management
2. MD at 200 dispensers an acre 100/acre Area Wide Management
3. Last Call - N/A
4. Puffer Technology 1
dispenser/acre $90/105 Canadian
Estimated
Budget cost of each method per acre spread over the
Questions
regarding control methods (Mating Disruption, SIT, Banding, etc) were clarified
throughout discussion.
After
discussion from the Committee Members, the following motion was put forward as
a companion to first motion made on
Moved by Hank Markgraf Seconded by Brian Witzke
“Be it resolved that the SIR eliminate
non-essential costs. Develop and implement a Codling Moth suppression Program
that is technically feasible. Pursue and secure outside funding and reduce and
maintain the cost to the grower at $65.00/acre through the balance of the
Program to the year 2005.”
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Brian Witzke then questioned Hugh Philip about
Puffer Technology.
Hugh Philip stated that they could be bringing the
Puffers into B.C. by next year. They can be set to come on just at the flight
time, by a computer chip. The one that the
AGENDA TOPIC #1:
The
minutes of the
The
following motion was then put forward.
“Accepted minutes for meeting dated
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
AGENDA TOPIC #2 (Cont.):
Gavin Young then stated that Elise Petersen wanted
to get feedback from the Committee Members regarding the Compliance Grants
issued this year.
Elise Petersen stated that the Compliance Grants are
issued to the Grower, and not the Leasee. This has upset some Leasee’s because
they are the ones who pay for the sprays in order to get the grant.
Gavin Young then discussed how the Compliance Grant
came to be through the Board.
Gavin then questioned the Committee for feedback on
if there should be changes made as to who gets the Grant.
Hank Markgraf stated that there should be no changes
made by SIR. But, Fieldmen could and have stressed to the Leasees that they
adjust their Lease agreement so that it states that the Leasee is entitled to
the Grant. It could also state that the Leasee pays all the Parcel Tax for the
SIR portion, and the owner pays the rest of the taxes. That is an agreement
between the Leasee and the owner.
Elise Petersen then added that SIR could also add a
note in with the Grant, stating that the Grant should go to the person who was
liable for the sprays.
Bob Fugger then stated that many Growers have been
thinking that the SIR tax is not a parcel tax, but a levy. That information is
wrong. The SIR tax is a tax, and if not paid, the owner will be penalized.
Elise Petersen also noted that the Compliance Grant
will come out next month.
AGENDA TOPIC #3:
Gavin Young then questioned the Committee about the
Administration of the Program. He asked that, if we are going to reduce the
overall cost of the Program, or change the delivery of the Program, is there a
need for major Administration?
Being not just a stand alone project, is there a
need for a stand alone Administration? Should it be scaled down prior to 2005?
Discussion then carried throughout the Committee.
Moved by Tom Ouchi Seconded by Hank Markgraf
“Be it resolved that the SIR itemize and
prioritise the SIR Administration, keeping it in line with the other Motions
carried.”
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
CLOSING
Meeting adjourned at
_______________________
________________________
Chairman Secretary